On Sat, 20.08.11 04:50, Kevin Kofler (kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > Tim Waugh wrote: > > Oh, I just noticed this: > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines:Systemd#Socket_activation > > "Since Fedora currently doesn't want any services to do on-demand > > loading, all socket activated services must autostart." > > What the heck?! We're disabling systemd's main feature there, aren't we? > Wasn't the main design concept behind systemd the observation that > everything can be parallelized most effectively by on-demand activation? While it is of course disappointing if we do not use lazy socket activation of CUPS in Fedora the ability to do lazy socket activation is only one of the many benefits of socket activation. I'd claim the most interesting advantage of socket activation is that it drastically improves parallelization and simplifies the execution ordering logic at boot-up. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
