Am 30.07.2011 04:16, schrieb Dave Jones: > On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 01:16:43AM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > i have running 2.6.40-4.fc15.x86_64 #1 SMP in my testing-virtual-machine since > > some minutes, boot looked fine, after a minute a got a btrfs-stack-trace > > > > hope this helps (no i do not tend use btrfs in production *gg*) > > hmm, doesn't look like that one has been reported before. > Can you file this in bugzilla please ? I expect Josef will want to take > a look at it next week. > > thanks, > > Dave > done: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726868 Am 30.07.2011 04:29, schrieb Genes MailLists: > wasn't there some kind of issue in vm's ? > Maybe I'm not remembering correctly no - performance sucks if the VM is stored on a BTRFS formatted disk this is a completly other problem and it must not make a differnece if a FS is used inside or outside a virtual machine, not in 2011 the BTRFS-FS in this VM survived two dist-upgrades until now :-)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
