Re: Intent to package GNOME Shell frippery

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 06:28, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 11:15 +0200, drago01 wrote:
>> >> Distro packaged extensions are frowned upon upstream.
>> >
>> > [citation needed]
>>
>> https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-shell-list/2011-June/msg00164.html
>
> Seriously, who cares? Upstream are clearly on crack these days anyway.
>
> The best way to discourage people from shipping and installing
> 'extensions' is to make the basic user interface not suck in the first
> place. They failed at that.

Please refrain from insults.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux