Re: Intent to package GNOME Shell frippery

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 11:36:50 +0200
Tomasz Torcz <tomek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>   I would strongly prefer third parties not to reinvent whole
> packaging and repositories concept.  Some companies grasp it (I have
> yum repos provided for Google Earth and Talk Plugin, Dell BIOSes and
> firmwares, Adobe Flash and Air, Virtualbox...).

This, exactly.

>   Actually, if addons.m.o and extensions.g.o provided yum.repo file,
> my point would be moot.

That would be very nice indeed, and might even be possible to
create given that the code for AMO is open
(https://github.com/jbalogh/zamboni)

Hopefully extensions.gnome.org will at least re-use some of that code
instead of doing it yet another way again...

--Stijn
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux