On 07/27/2011 12:19 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Wed, 27.07.11 17:40, Roman Rakus (rrakus@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > >> >> Hi all, >> from the discussion here, I'm tempted to revert the change. Any objections? > > Yes. I am for keeping it in, and have prepped a patch for XDG basedir to > make it official. > What actually is the benefit of doing this? Why does xdg need the shell have the PATH env include this - if xdg wants to use a fixed path - then should it not use a fixed path and not require specific PATH environment anyway? There seem to be 2 issues here which are being mixed up it seems to me ... (i) merits of putting binaries in a .local/bin area for xdg convenience (or whatever) (ii) need to have that same area be in the default PATH. (i) does not imply (ii) at all. So I vote to remove it from the default shell path. gene -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
