Re: RPM version goes backward in Rawhide

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/27/11 2:03 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> There is a big difference between "a package going backwards in its EVR
> and staying there" and "a package getting untagged because it breaks koji
> buildroot and with the plan to go forward in EVR as soon as the bug is
> found and fixed".

If it goes backwards to await a fix, that fix needs to be happening 
within the same day or so.  Not prolonged so that updates fail on users' 
systems.

> In this case, the bad rpm-build broke koji builds, and since Rawhide
> may eat babies, it can happen that Rawhide users need downgrade manually
> while they have to wait for the fixed rpm-build.

We are trying very hard to kill the notion that "rawhide may eat 
babies".  It's non-productive.  There are multiple ways to throw 
baby-eating updates over the wall for testing before they get into 
rawhide.  Stop treating it like a dumping ground.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux