On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 17:49:43 +0100 "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 08:45:11AM -0430, Robert Marcano wrote: > > On 07/26/2011 08:36 AM, Genes MailLists wrote: > > > On 07/26/2011 08:03 AM, Misha Shnurapet wrote: > > >> 26.07.2011, 18:34, "Andrew Haley"<aph@xxxxxxxxxx>: > > >>> On 26/07/11 10:22, Misha Shnurapet wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> Since F15 ~/bin has been added to PATH, and commands that are > > >>>> supposed to run user scripts will work without changing into > > >>>> that directory. Meanwhile, ~/.local/bin isn't used. I'd like > > >>>> to propose that it is also added because technically it is > > >>>> ~/bin's brother. > > >>> > > >>> I've never heard of ~/.local/bin . Are there many people who > > >>> use this? ~/bin is common. > > >> > > >> ~/.local/bin has been there by default. > > >> > > >> Unlike ~/bin, which is in PATH though not even created. > > >> > > > > > > Where in the path do the user 'bin' elements appear in the > > > path? > > > > In /etc/skel/.bash_profile they are added to the end and I think > > that is ok > > > > PATH=$PATH:$HOME/.local/bin:$HOME/bin > > This was added between bash-4.2.10 -2 and -3: > > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=bash.git;a=commitdiff;h=02b20d810111e8b53bb98ad49fedd1d583ce62e1 > > because of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699812 > > There is some rationale in that bug, but I think it's extremely bogus. Oh it seems every useful for purposes like installing executables that most users will never find. > > Rich. > -- Bernd Stramm bernd.stramm@xxxxxxxxx -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
