Hi, I need some help clarifying this issue in order to know if this is a bug or limits of the NFSv4 / POSIX ACL mapping before reporting it Creating a directory on the server with the following POSIX ACLs, rwx for the group "sharedgroup" and same defaults: ############################################################ # file: directory # owner: root # group: root user::rwx group::r-x group:sharedgroup:rwx mask::rwx other::--- default:user::rwx default:group::r-x default:group:sharedgroup:rwx default:mask::rwx default:other::--- ############################################################ Creating files with the same user with umask 022 on the server an on the NFS client, the files do not get the same POSIX ACL mask: ############################################################ # file: client # owner: test # group: testgroup user::rw- group::r-x #effective:r-- group:sharedgroup:rwx #effective:r-- mask::r-- other::r-- # file: server # owner: test # group: testgroup user::rw- group::r-x #effective:r-- group:sharedgroup:rwx #effective:rw- mask::rw- other::r-- ############################################################ Is this normal or a bug?, My interpretation is that even that the mapping of the ACLs is not 100% perfect this simple example should not be a problem. Is it impossible using NFS to create a shared directory for a group of users? -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
