Re: F15: ugly behavior of "df"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/21/2011 07:09 AM, Steve Clark wrote:

> Well what benefit(s) does the new 'df' provide, is it worth all the pain
> it brings?
> 

  I concur - the current df behavior is well .. goofy :-) - however this
may be tricky to fix in the new world - but should be fixed.

  If this behavior is somehow desirable it would be preferable to  make
it an option (like df --full or whatever) and make the default something
more sensible.

  That said, it may be tricky in the new world;

   where can you retrieve the info about a mount being a bind mount ?
How can you push the chrooted bind mounts into being less obtrusive (or
even optional, --show-chrooted-mounts)

  /proc/mounts does not seem to distinguish bind mounts - so this may
have to be a kernel change and perhaps adding /proc/mounts/bind and
moving bind mounts 1 level down - this is not an area I know a lot about
however, so I'll leave this to the real experts.

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux