On 07/21/2011 06:37 AM, Iain Arnell wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Rex Dieter<rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Panu Matilainen wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> FYI, there appears to be a bug in the just-released rpm-4.9.1 which
>>> causes legitimate specs to fail with "Installed (but unpackaged) file(s)
>>> found" errors. This happens when recursively included directories in
>>> %files are marked with trailing /, eg
>>>
>>> %{_includedir}/mypkg works everywhere, but %{_includedir}/mypkg/ is now
>>> failing in rawhide.
>>>
>>> This is NOT intentional, don't start changing your packages. Somebody
>>> please untag rpm-4.9.1 from rawhide, I'll deal with the issue later on.
>>
>> done,
>
> I see that we now have rpm-4.9.1-2.fc16, but it still doesn't seem
> quite right. Previously, httpd (for example) used to have files:
>
> /etc/httpd
> /etc/httpd/conf
> /etc/httpd/conf.d
> /etc/httpd/conf.d/README
> /etc/httpd/conf.d/welcome.conf
> /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf
> /etc/httpd/conf/magic
> /etc/httpd/logs
> ...
>
> But since being rebuilt yesterday with the new 4.9.1, some of those
> directories are now listed with the trailing slash:
>
> /etc/httpd/
> /etc/httpd/conf.d/
> /etc/httpd/conf.d/README
> /etc/httpd/conf.d/welcome.conf
> /etc/httpd/conf/
> /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf
> /etc/httpd/conf/magic
> /etc/httpd/logs
>
> Which has broken at least one package that requires /etc/httpd/conf.d
>
> Is listing the trailing slash intended behaviour and the dependent
> package(s) now needs fixing?
Hmm, no that's not intended either. Appears to be one of those
releases... sigh. Please just untag rpm-4.9.1-2.fc16 too, I'll try to
have a look at it tomorrow.
- Panu -
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
