Re: Heads up: cpuspeed removed from f16+

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




----- Original Message -----
> On 07/19/2011 09:59 AM, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> To avoid some confusion:
> >>
> >> I removed cpuspeed from Rawhide about 10 days ago. It no longer
> >> serves
> >> any
> >> purpose in Fedora and has been effectively replaced by kernel
> >> cpufreq
> >> stack.
> >>
> >> All cpufreq modules should now be built-in, with ondemand being the
> >> default
> >> governor in Fedora.
> >>
> >> In case you would to use a different governor and/or specific
> >> frequency, try the
> >> new cpupower.service (provieded by cpupowerutils). Most people
> >> shouldn't need
> >> this, though.
> >>
> >> See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713572 for more
> >> info.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> --
> >> # Petr Sabata
> >>
> >> --
> >> devel mailing list
> >> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> >
> > Sad that the daemon gone. It was able to dynamically switch speed
> > (and save power) on systems that have CPUs with high transition
> > latency (e.g. old P4, some Atoms, etc.). On such systems the
> 
> Actually, no...
> 
> http://codemonkey.org.uk/2009/01/18/forthcoming-p4clockmod/
> 
> > So the 1.00GHz ‘frequency’ is actually “run at 2GHz, but only do
> > work 50% of the time”.
> >
> > On the surface, this sounds like a good idea. The other 50%, the CPU
> > is idle, so you’re saving power, right?
> > Not so much. In fact, you could be burning more power. The reason
> > for this is that when the processor is sitting there doing nothing,
> > it isn’t lower frequency, and more importantly, it very likely isn’t
> > entering C states. So you’re burning the same amount of power, but
> > now you’re only doing work for 50% of the time. As a result of this,
> > your workload takes twice as long to complete.
> 
> I've measured it, and Dave is right. You might get something saying
> "1.0Ghz" but you're not saving anything at all.
> 
> -Eric

It is heating less, but you are not saving power? Sorry, but I cannot
understand. The more energy consumed for the same computational 
load is another story

Jaroslav
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux