On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 10:37:51AM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 09:11:23AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 07/13/2011 07:47 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 11:35 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > > >> On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 16:57 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > > >> > > >>> Maybe it it is an idea to build a whitelist for machines which do > > >>> have working ACPI lid support? I realize maintaining such a list is > > >>> a pain, but this way people who care and are lucky enough to have actually > > >>> working hardware can at least use this ? > > >> > > >> It's an idea, but not one I'd do. Either a whitelist or a blacklist > > >> would be oppressively large. > > > > > > I suppose a whitelist has the advantage that it can't hurt anything > > > compared to the current state, and no matter how short it is, it > > > benefits *some* people. > > > > Yeah, that is my main reason for suggesting this, thanks for wording it > > so eloquently for me :) Note I'm not volunteering to do the work > > -ENOTIME. > > > > Would something like "use_acpi_lid_status" kernel cmdline option be too ugly? :) > At least it would be easy to parse (grep /proc/cmdline) .. > Any comments about this way of doing it? -- Pasi -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
