Re: Inclusion/Exclusion of BuildRoot tag and %defattr

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 01:20:30PM +0100, Damian L Brasher wrote:
> Hi List
> 
> Referring to sections of Packaging Guidelines:
> 
> No longer necessary to explicitly include %defattr at the beginning of %
> files.
> 
> and the fact that the BuildRoot tag, eve if defined, is ignored.
> 
> After reviewing packages I have suggested %defattr is not strictly
> necessary. I have also removed %defattr(-,root,root,-) from my
> contributed spec file https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=644711
> 
> Is this correct, i.e. do the package review request authors need to be
> notified?
> 
> i.e. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720085

They are now optional but there's no need to force people to be rid of them.
In particular, some people like to build a package for both Fedora and
EPEL-5.  In this case, a lot of the things that are optional in Fedora have
to remain for the EPEL package.

-Toshio

Attachment: pgpNKgTEe46Tp.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux