Re: Calling autoconf in a spec.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Kevin Kofler writes:

Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> There's a big difference between having the upstream, who knows their
> configure script inside and out,

That's a very bold assertion. ;-)

I do not see anything particularly bold about it. This seems to me like a reasonable statement.

                                   Many upstream developers just copy&paste
their configure.ac scripts together from examples or other projects without
understanding them. The current maintainer might also not be the developer
who wrote the scripts (who is often the only one understanding them).

Well, I just don't have that impression. What I do find a bit hard to believe is that somebody else other than the package's developer group would be in a better position to decide the merits of adopting a policy of automatically rebuilding the code using whatever version of autotools is installed.


Attachment: pgpZ9YNe6RtbB.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux