Re: rpm builds failing with "Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jon Ciesla wrote:
> Rex Dieter wrote:
>   
>> Panu Matilainen wrote:
>>
>>   
>>     
>>> FYI, there appears to be a bug in the just-released rpm-4.9.1 which
>>> causes legitimate specs to fail with "Installed (but unpackaged) file(s)
>>> found" errors. This happens when recursively included directories in
>>> %files are marked with trailing /, eg
>>>
>>> %{_includedir}/mypkg works everywhere, but %{_includedir}/mypkg/ is now
>>> failing in rawhide.
>>>
>>> This is NOT intentional, don't start changing your packages. Somebody
>>> please untag rpm-4.9.1 from rawhide, I'll deal with the issue later on.
>>>     
>>>       
>> done, 
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722474
>>
>>   
>>     
> I just hit this, when can we safely retry?
>
> -J
>
>   
Apparently now. :)

-J

-- 
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love

-d. bowie

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux