On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 01:22:34PM -0400, Stan Bubrouski wrote: > Yeah i quickly figured that out after i sent the message. Wasn't > feeling hot earlier and looking at my screen wasnt making feel better. > But now my question would be: why the new dependency on SWIG? The older swig packages weirdly only provide versionless .so files -- libswigpl.so, for example. So packages like subversion end up with dependencies on that directly. Really, there should be something like libswigpl.so.0, and the other package would have dependencies on that. The new swig packages fix the problem, but until the old other package are rebuilt against it, they'll be confused. At least, that's my understanding. Anyone who knows better, feel free to correct me. :) -- Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://www.mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>
