On 06/24/2011 03:15 PM, Matt Domsch wrote: > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 07:17:45PM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote: >> Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64 >> using rawhide from 2011-06-16 > > As a reminder, please do not simply "CLOSED NOTABUG" your FTBFS bugs. > By the time I started mass-filing 564 bugs yesterday, any packages I > filed bugs against had failed to build at least 6 times through, so > _something_ is failing. It may not be a bug in your package; it may > well be a bug in mock, or in a package you BR. However, your package > does FTBFS. > > If you believe this is actually a bug in another package, do NOT > change the component in this bug or close this bug. Instead, add the > appropriate bug number from the other package to the "Depends on" line > in this bug. If the other package does not yet have a bug created > that you think matches, please create one. Doing so helps us properly > track bugs and their dependencies, just as we track package > dependencies. (If you close this bug, and the other package is not > fixed before the next FTBFS run, a new bug will get created. Please > follow the above advice to avoid such duplication.) > > > There are a couple common failures we're seeing now: > ... > ** Sendmail bug 716460 > Error: Package: sendmail-8.14.5-1.fc16.x86_64 (ftbfs) > Requires: libdb-5.1.so()(64bit) sendmail-8.14.5-2.fc16, built against libdb-5.2, has been in Rawhide since 17th June. http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-June/152920.html Paul. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
