Re: Trusted Boot in Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andrew Haley wrote:
> What I don't understand is why this feature requires a binary blob.
> Surely whatever northbridge code is required can be free software,
> Is this just security through obscurity?

That's a good question. I get the impression that Sinit (as the blob seems to 
be called) is from Intel. Intel is a hardware company. Selling licenses for 
unfree software isn't their business model, and they're already involved in 
writing free drivers for their graphics and wifi chips. If Intel is pushing to 
have this feature included in Fedora, what prevents them from setting Sinit 
free?

Björn Persson

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux