On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 13:31 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > So what is the point of effectively rewriting existing sysV services in a new > sysV dialect now (to rewrite them again next release as native systemd units) > instead or rewriting them directly as systemd services? In both cases there is > a high risk of regressions as dependency logic was not tested before. Except > that systemd works better with native units, so I'm far from sure the less > risky path is to try to "fix" sysV services so they semi-work. If you're so worried about the dependency logic, why not just update the package and *remove* the incomplete or incorrect dependency statements entirely, and thereby cause systemd to fall back on the numeric ordering? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
