On Mon, 20.06.11 10:40, Adam Williamson (awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > On Sun, 2011-06-19 at 15:42 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > i need to be sorry because i never had thought that since "systemd" was > > planned for F14 and not ready it will be for F15, and ready is for me > > using it really as designed or delay the release again - it is unacceptable > > fpr a production-environment fire up services in random order :-( > > You keep talking about 'random order' but I'm not sure this is accurate. > My understanding was that systemd respects the dependency information in > LSB-compliant headers and hence will fire these up in the correct order > as long as the dependencies are correct. If there are any LSB-type > headers with incorrect or incomplete dependency information, this is a > bug that *can* be fixed with updates to F15. Yes, Adam, your understanding is correct. > I don't know if it respects the number-based ordering for services which > simply don't include LSB-compliant dependency information at all. Yes, it respects the number-based ordering between two services if neither includes LSB information. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
