Hello List I am currently working with these two packages to bring them into Fedora (I also lead (co)-develop and maintain them): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=644711 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699843 A few weeks ago I set up an auto-responder as I migrated our website to http://www.interlinux.org.uk , apologies to anyone that received unwanted bounces. Thanks to a Red Hat employee:) for notifying me by phone. I recently changed the way the code IP was managed from a business model and am moving towards a Code Foundation organizational structure. The projects now have access to a RHEL data center hosted server safe for OSS community development. Currently, I'm working as a full time RHEL SA in a hosting environment, more about me here: http://uk.linkedin.com/in/dbrasher I expect to continue developing mainly during weekends. I am now reading through the most important packaging documentation again and will soon be ready to provide a reciprocal package review. I noted in Bug 644711 that perhaps it would be more efficient to review one of the dependencies - is this necessarily the case? Best Regards Damian L Brasher - http://www.interlinux.org.uk -- Interlinux Engineering Foundation Central, non-trading, administration, governance and dissemination of foundation intellectual property and know-how. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
