On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 21:08, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On May 18, 2004, Rui Miguel Seabra <rms@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > If this is true, then it should be considered a bug. I'll investigate > > later... > > You're not required to accept the GNU GPL to run the code. The GNU > GPL explicitly says that anything but copying, distribution and > modification are outside of its scope, and that the act of running the > program is not restricted. Well in most of Europe, copying the binary code from disk to ram or from ram to CPU is distributing as explicit part of copyright law ;)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part