On 06/10/2011 07:04 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 09.06.2011, 13:40 +0400 schrieb Lucas: >> What kind of relation between Xfce maintainers and SLIM. > > The Fedora Xfce SIG considered SLIM but we didn't use it because (at > least at that time) it had some problems with ConsoleKit. > I use xfce since fedora 13 and slim also. I always had to do something to make it works. What are those problems with consolekit you mentioned? > We are still trying to get rid of GDM but we are more after LightDM now. > I have packaged it and it basically works on F>= 15, but the package > and LightDM requires some more work. > > I don't think that Xfce upstream has a relationship to SLIM in > particular because the project seems pretty much dead. > >> I always thought SLIM is just display manager, which can start >> whatever I want. > > That is correct, but you either need to configure the default desktop or > use the sylm-dynwm script. For more info have a look at > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/LXDE#SLiM > > Regards, > Christoph > > I, personally, agree that GDM should be replaced, especially after someone decided to move "reboot" and "shutdown" to it. (I found it in Fedora XFCE spin), so now I am thinking how to allow "systemctl reboot" for normal user from xfce. I will check LightDM, but as long as slim works for me, I am going to use it. Thanks. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
