Re: Module symbol versions in installer kernel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Saturday 15 May 2004 15:32, Paul Gear wrote:
> We're talking FC1 here, not FC2.  It is kernel 2.4.22, not 2.6.  Does
> that make any difference to the situation?

Only difference would be /usr/src/linux-2.4 instead of -2.6

> > If you're installing off of CD, the install
> > kernel is the same version, but built for i586, and not i686.  Thus
> > you must build your module against a i586 configured kernel source
> > tree.
>
> As far as i can tell, the disc i built included all kernel versions.
> That is the default on Doug Ledford's dd kit, isn't it?  I'll double
> check this.

Yes, I do believe so.

- -- 
Jesse Keating RHCE      (http://geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team      (http://www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key          
(http://geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)

Was I helpful?  Let others know:
 http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAp6474v2HLvE71NURAhQ4AKC5WJJ66zNIibe1ECFNTZ2ATcn8vgCgt3Zd
qH69p6FvHTH43oaFvE7GoFY=
=bQ+6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux