On 06/02/2011 04:51 PM, Petr Sabata wrote: > Why would you include an "optional functionality" (a quote from Packaging > guidelines) package in the default installation? I don't think being "optional functionality" alone prevents something being installed by default. And the point of the quoted part in the packaging guidelines is not at all bash-completion or whether it's optional, it's just used as an example illustrating dir ownership scenarios. Looking at what's currently in the @base group in comps-f16.xml.in tells me that there's a *lot* of optional functionality already in it, in fact I think the majority of stuff in it is more or less optional (including of the ones marked as mandatory in it). -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
