Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: > On 06/03/2011 05:19 AM, Neal Becker wrote: >> So it is ultimately conditioned on fedora version, not foo-devel version. > > Just curious, why don't you require the version that doesn't require the > patch? > In the future, let's say the patch will be required. This is somewhat academic. I actually have a patch that works with any version. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel