Once upon a time, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> said: > Maybe I'm not understanding your question correctly, but a filesystem > is more general than LVM. You can create directories corresponding to > your current VGs and files for your LVs, with the advantage that you > can nest directories which you can't do with LVM VGs. > > However the performance issue will be critical -- even 5% slower > really matters for VMs. But I hope btrfs can close this gap because > the filesystem design is really nice. That was really my original point (that I didn't really state clearly I guess); btrfs performance with VM disk images should be compared against LVM VGs as well against ext4. -- Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx> Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
