Matthew Miller wrote:
> Since we also already ship the environment-modules package, an env-module
> for plan 9 could be included; users who want the plan 9 binaries could
> either set their path manually or run "module load plan9".
>
> This seems preferable to the "alternatives" system, since it's per-user
> rather than systemwide.
Alternatives is entirely unacceptable for this kind of core system binaries
anyway. You break a lot of things if e.g. /bin/ls suddenly does something
different.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
