On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 16:05 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 05/12/2011 01:10 PM, Dmitri Bachtin wrote: > > Is the pino upstream active right now? Pino's default branch is broken. > > > > I took FC15's SRPM as base and started patching it to bring pino into > > proper shape. It builds with current FC15's builddeps already (patches > > in Fedora's bug tracker) and maximizes properly. I want to build > > autorefreshing into it and fill menus this or next week. > > > > Does it make sense to provide the patches to Fedora and propose them > > to upstream later or should I develop against the upstream's default > > branch and ask upstream to reintegrate them in hope that the changes > > will flow into Fedora later? > > File them upstream first. We will pick it up. Notify us if you it is > anything important. Thanks for the patches. If you want to be a > co-maintainer of Pino in Fedora, drop me a mail offlist and I can help > you with that. If you want to make sure the fixes get into Fedora fast you can add them to the Fedora package as patches, but always make sure they're submitted upstream first, and comment the patch with the URL to the upstream submission. Fedora has a principle/policy of working upstream, we always consider it 'wrong' to patch something only in the Fedora package and hope upstream will pull it on their own initiative, always send it upstream yourself. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
