Re: Is Rawhide supposed to be useful?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 09:04, Adam Jackson <ajax@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 5/10/11 11:34 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:

> Things breaking in Rawhide are not a surprise; indeed, if it doesn't
> occasionally bite the hand that's feeding it, somebody probably isn't
> trying hard enough.  But if it can remain this fundamentally broken for
> weeks because the relevant developer forgot to fix it, it's hard not to
> conclude that nobody is really running it.

In the week before F15 change freeze, are you really surprised that
nobody's running the F16 dumping ground?


I am running the F16 dumping ground. I do daily updates to rawhide and report bugs as I see them. In other words, I'm always running the "rolling" release.

Breakage for those of us who live on this edge is something we're familiar with. It would just be helpful to have the occasional heads-up for known breakages, rather than having to discover them in unpleasant ways.

darrell 

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux