2011/5/10 Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx>: > On Tue, 10 May 2011 09:59:12 -0300 > Sergio Belkin <sebelk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Let's say that you make a RPM for fedora, and then you want to make >> for epel5. Should I keep the fedora entries on changelog? > > I usually do, yes. It's history of the package... Good point > >> Second question is somewhat silly, but I make it, just in case. Let's >> say that you want to make a epe6 package too. >> >> I've read at >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Minor_release_bumps_for_old_branches >> that I should add set something as 1%{?dist}.1 on Release to make >> older that epel6 package. Should I add the same for the changelog >> entry on epel5 package? >> >> I mean: >> >> * Tue Mar 01 2011 Sergio Belkin <sebelk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - >> 1%{?dist}.1 ? > > No need. > > EPEL doesn't need you to preserve the upgrade path between major > releases like Fedora does. AFAIK in RHEL upgrades between major > releases are simply not supported. You are expected to re-install if > you go from RHEL5 to RHEL6. So, no requirement that the RHEL5 version > be less than the RHEL6 one. ;) > > Hopefully I understood your question... you did did that help? Yes it did :) > > kevin -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
