W dniu 9 maja 2011 17:34 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski <mkkp4x4@xxxxxxxxx> napisał: > 2011/5/9 Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxx>: >> =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Micha=B3_Piotrowski?= <mkkp4x4@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >>> Ok, I know what is happening. I looked at the init script and I >>> realized that it doesn't have any LSB header info about boot process >>> order. >> >> No, it's assuming that the chkconfig numbering takes care of that. > > Do you mean these numbers before script name in /etc/rc.d/rc*.d/ ? > >> Are you saying that systemd no longer honors the chkconfig ordering? > > It seems to me that mysql starts before NetworkManager here > http://eventhorizon.pl/images/bootchart17.png > >> That doesn't leave me with a warm feeling about how much testing the >> systemd stuff has gotten, because there is all kinds of stuff that's >> liable to fall over without that. >> >>> I also looked at other services and here are some of them that >>> needs fixing: >>> - memcached - (I created systemd service for it) - I can provide a >>> patch for classic init script >>> - smb - as above >>> - nmb - as above >>> - mysql - I can provide a patch for classic init scrip >>> - postgresql - as above >> >> Yes, mysql and postgresql are both certainly broken by this. Please >> send the info, I'll take care of those two. > > I'll create bug reports and send proposed patches later. > Patch for MySQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703214 for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703215 Bootchart shows me that now MySQL starts in the right order. What about the rest of the mentioned init scripts? For the samba there is a native systemd service in bugzilla - the same for memcached. -- Best regards, Michal http://eventhorizon.pl/ -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
