On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 19:59 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > sounds like a perfectly good reason to file negative karma on the > > 'revised' update, then. Really - if you think the update is causing > > significant problems, file negative karma, raise a stink about it. We > > don't have to accept the update. > > Done, but given that the glibc maintainers have already stated their > intention to walk away from that update and file a new one so they can > ignore the bad karma on it, I don't have a lot of faith that I wasn't > wasting my time. to be fair, that was just to circumvent the bodhi issue I noted earlier. I don't think they actually want to ignore negative feedback on the *new* update, they just don't want negative feedback from the old update considered as applying to the new one. Which is reasonable. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
