Re: Some changes to EPEL package reviews

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/29/11 8:54 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>>> >  >  How is this any different, given that process-git-requests creates a
>>> >  >  rawhide branch without regard to whether one asks for it or not?
>> >
>> >  I think the idea is that it allows people who wish to see reviews that
>> >  are EPEL only. So, perhaps they have more interest or desire to review
>> >  those.;)
> Correct. And it gives us something to key off of to possibly change
> process-git-requests in the future.

It is somewhat difficult, and odd, to create a git repo that does not 
have a master branch.  It would be a little more odd to potentially at 
some point in the future create the master branch for a package should 
it find a home within Fedora.

There need not be much/any content in the master branch, but there 
should still be one for each package.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux