On 29/04/11 00:37, MichaÅ Piotrowski wrote: > Hi, > > I think it's a very good decision - I never understood why selinux dir > is directly under /. > > By the way, maybe it would be good to think about the meaning of /srv > existance? For seven years FHS requires that this directory exists > http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#PURPOSE16A > but "The methodology used to name subdirectories of /srv is > unspecified as there is currently no consensus on how this should be > done" - so even the authors of the standard did not have anything to > say about how this directory should be used. Is there a rational > reason for the existence of this directory besides FHS conformance? > These are two separate issues. /srv tends to prevent people creating top level mounts, so I would definitely keep it. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
