On Wed, 2004-05-12 at 11:32 +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > Hi Mark, > > > Over the last few days we've been doing some checking of FC1 and FC2 > > security issues. > > Thanks for the update, but instead of using only CAN numbers it would be > more clear to most when you'd also name the involved packages. > > Leonard. Perhaps simply a suggestion of where people should find more information. The purpose of CAN numbers is to clearly, unambiguously, identify issues... so people won't have to explain each issue -- they could indirectly involve numerous packages... The initial email was from a 'compulsive reader of security lists' so it was fair to assume he knew this. http://www.cve.mitre.org/cve/ For CAN-2004-0113 for instance... http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvekey.cgi?keyword=CAN-2004-0113 -- Andrew Farris, CPE senior (California Polytechnic State University, SLO) fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx :: lmorgul on irc.freenode.net "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." (Edmond Burke)
