On 04/28/2011 02:00 AM, Kamil Paral wrote: >> Keeping the current way will just make me (and possibly others) >> add filters to throw away messages from AutoQA. Please be aware of >> how much contributor time you waste by making them hope through >> useless (because the tests have passed and no information is >> gained) mails. I realize you want to improve things, but at the >> current stage its consuming the most valuable resource we have, >> packager/developer time. > > We will certainly improve that. But for the near future I don't see > much ways to change the notification system (using Bodhi comments). > We can either have it the way it is or disable it completely (we > can't use opting in/out, we must operate on all updates or none of > them). > > I believe the current state is good enough to have AutoQA comments > enabled, even though it's not perfect. You may disagree. If many > maintainers claim they would rather have AutoQA completely disabled, > we can do it. But the current state helps us fix the tests > tremendously. In the mean time, we work on improving the AutoQA > architecture. > > As a simple workaround for you (and maybe for some others), why don't > you define a simple mail filter that detects an AutoQA Bodhi comment > and marks it as read if it contains PASSED comment? That will save > you from wasting time reading them. > > Another option is to work with Bodhi authors to implement your ideas. > It will be great if you do. To add a little more detail, we are working on this [1], but I don't think that any fix will make it into the production systems for at least a week or two. Until that happens, the best workaround that we can suggest is to use an email filter like Kamil suggested. Again, thanks for your feedback and patience. Tim [1] https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/ticket/314
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
