On 04/21/2011 09:35 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 15:51 +0200, Marcela MaÅlÃÅovà wrote: >> On 04/21/2011 03:29 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >>> On 04/21/2011 05:36 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >>>> >>>> I presume, I am supposed to love the broken deps, these anaconda dumps >>>> and this silly Win95-ish "Oh no!,..." screens of death? >>>> >>>> All three happened to me, when trying this Beta, yesterday ;) >>> >>> Filing bug reports is helpful and what one is supposed to do under such >>> circumstances. If you want to discuss issues, use the test list instead >>> >>> Rahul >> >> Branched report with number of missing requires goes on fedora-devel and >> to maintainers of those packages, so they must be aware of it. The list >> is shorter than it was before beta but there's still lot of packages. Do >> we want to release it as it is? > > We consider broken deps within the set of packages included in the > released images to block the release, but there are none of those in > Beta. Broken deps outside the package set that gets on images aren't > really as important. Longer version of what has happened: I had a more or less functional f15-Alpha test installation and ran "yum update". After rebooting, any attempt to log in through the GUI ended with a "Oh no!..." - ... should not have happened, but it's a test release, ... so not much reason to complain. I decided to reinstall using netinstall.iso. Initially (1st try), I tried a "customized package set". I was warned about a long series of missing deps. The install however proceeded and ended with anaconda raising before-mentioned error. Then, (2nd try) I tried a "default package set" w/ *testing deactivate. I was warned about gnome-session missing dependency and ended up with "Oh no! Then (3rd try) I tried a "default package set" w/ *testing activated. I was warned about gnome-session missing dependencies. This time, I was able to login. Ralf -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
