On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 19:05 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Axel Thimm wrote: > > Unfortunately security updates are explicitly listed as to be handled > > like critical path packages, so Adam is correct in the current context, > > at least if the wiki page is not incorrect. > > I think you're misunderstanding the wiki page. The "including security > updates" phrase there means that security updates for critical path packages > are to be treated like any other critpath updates. It doesn't say anything > about security updates for other packages. Right. It's pretty simple - at present, whether an update is a security update simply doesn't matter to the acceptance process. It's not taken into account at all. What's taken into account is whether the update is for a stable release or for a pre-release, and whether it's critical path. That's all. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
