On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 10:50 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Axel Thimm wrote: > > Maybe the bodhi messages confused me. When I logon to a.f.o/updates it > > prominently displays: > > > > Bodhi is now enforcing the Package Update Acceptance > > Criteria across all Fedora releases. > > The criteria which are being enforced do not include AutoQA results at this > time. They do, however, include minimum testing (time and/or karma) > requirements, which probably explains why your stable request was rejected. > (And I've been fighting against those requirements since they were first > proposed, because I strongly believe this decision should really be up to > the maintainer, but I lost that battle.) Well, two questions: a) Weren't updates marked as security updates handled specially? E.g. the packages to get tagged as push-requested with the final decision being a pusher's review of the request? b) In the past if karma/time requirements were not met one could still mark the request and the request would show up. Possibly not granted/processed until the requirements were met (unless the package was security related or fixing a too nasty bug), but not immediately cleared as if it never happened (which is the current state). -- http://thimm.gr/ - http://ATrpms.net/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
