On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 04:35 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote: > > I built two sets of security updates for f13/f14/f15 and autoqa > > rejected > > the f13/f14 packages. It looks like autoqa is waiting for the > packages > > to be properly pushed to f<N+1> stable before green-lighting the > > matching package for f<N>. > > I suppose you're talking about upgradepath test. Yes, that's exactly > its behavior. This seems wrong to me. If I as a packager create an upgrade in bodhi, autoqa should consider what is present in f<N+1> not only as stable package but also as proposed upgrade. It should then impose a constraint that the upgrade for f<N> can only be pushed to stable if f<N+1> is pushed to stable at the same time (or obviously independently before). Seeing a failed upgradepath test comment at least gives me the wrong feeling on what is going on. - Andreas -- BrandAss Andreas Bierfert, M.Sc. | phone: +49 6897 1721738 | GPG: C58CF1CB andreas.bierfert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx | fax: +49 6897 1722828 | signed/encrypted http://lowlatency.de | cell: +49 170 9665206 | mail preferred
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
