Re: PPA-like Structure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Eric Mesa (ericsbinaryworld@xxxxxxxxx) said: 
> I'm not sure if this is the right place to bring this up, but given the new
> high-speed development of Firefox - is Fedora going to stick with the plan
> of keeping on FF major release number per six months?
> 
> Ubuntu has the PPA scheme, but I think that's "dangerous" in that it gets
> people to d/l from personal repositories and negates the benefit of signed
> packages in official repos.
> 
> At the same time, I understand the need for Fedora releases to be released
> with a target set of tested programs.  And that's why we don't go up in
> Kernels and other major programs during each release.  And I think that's
> the right way to go for the majority of the programs, but perhaps not all of
> them.
> 
> Anyway, should I open up a wish bug on bugzilla or is this the best place to
> bring this up?  (or somewhere else?)

There's a standing FESCo ticket for a feature updates repo, but it's yet
to go into testing or production. Is that something that would suit your
needs?

Bill
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux