Re: rfc/headsup: graphics driver packaging in F16+

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Adam Jackson (ajax@xxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> On 4/13/11 5:14 AM, Phil Knirsch wrote:
> > On 04/12/2011 06:12 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> >> ast, ati, cirrus, fbdev, geode, intel, mga, nouveau, openchrome,
> >> qxl, sis/xgi, vesa, vmware
> >
> > Would this affect the way KVM and specifically qemu-kvm in it's default
> > setup for video using the cirrus driver would work? Just wondering if
> > there would be any implications for the virt guys in that regard.
> 
> "cirrus" is in that list for precisely that reason.

... should we work on making qemu/kvm default to something more modern/sane?
(qxl, vmware?) Does it not end up mattering (or do we need cirrus for
legacy OS support)?

Bill
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux