On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 19:28:44 +0200 Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 10:53:24 -0600, Kevin wrote: > > > On Sat, 9 Apr 2011 10:27:05 +0200 > > Michael Schwendt wrote: > > > > > Caution, everyone! > > > > > > It seems that bodhi no longer obsoletes update tickets when > > > submitting newer ones. Currently, there are several competing > > > test-updates, where a ticket exists for an old and a new release. > > > But only the older release is found in the repo actually due to a > > > bug in bodhi (either regression or still unfixed, but it has been > > > reported long ago). E.g. libchamplain and libinfinity. > > > > Auto obsoletes haven't been disabled... it looks like the old > > libchamplain had a stable request already on it, > > No, you're misreading things: > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libchamplain-0.9.1-1.fc15 > * bodhi - 2011-04-03 15:34:42 > This update has been submitted for testing by pbrobinson. > * bodhi - 2011-04-09 12:44:46 > This update has been submitted for stable by pbrobinson. > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libchamplain-0.10.0-1.fc15 > * bodhi - 2011-04-05 15:18:39 > This update has been submitted for testing by tbzatek. > * bodhi - 2011-04-11 09:18:46 > This update has been submitted for stable by tbzatek. So I am. Odd. ;( > Bad, bad, bad. No response to my comments inside those bodhi tickets. > Meanwhile, both packages have been requested to be pushed to stable, > but one of them has never been in updates-testing. Yeah, I am going to mail them both, but perhaps we should revoke both requests until they sort it out. ;( kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
