On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 5:54 AM, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Rahul Sundaram <metherid@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Why is this update a benefit for Fedora 14? ÂDoes it break any >> compatibility? ÂHave you done any testing with the affected packages? > > With the question of "would the package maintainers let me know if > this is currently possible?" my guess would be no, but then it was a > question. > > I think the shipping version of shotwell will have issues if it needs > to be recompiled but its worth noting that as vala only generates C > code which is then run native that apps shouldn't be affected. That > said I don't have the time to go through and test my list of vala > packages at the moment. I'm out of town right now, and won't get a chance to do any testing before tomorrow night, but based on my past experiences with folks + vala, I would lean against updating vala in our stable releases. Later, /B -- Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Bpepple gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B ÂCBDE 326A E936 810C C15E -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
