On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 21:47 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > I would generally agree with the brokenness of critical path. I > maintain the libraries that provide support for certain fruit based > iDevices and for some reason they're classed as crit path where as > clutter which is one of the core libraries of gnome 3 and its not. I > don't get it! This is really a pretty different complaint, and I'm not sure it's justified. The definition of critical path is perfectly clear. 'Weird' packages being part of the critical path usually simply happens through dependencies; some package that really *is* vital happens to depend on your library. (What I'd like to be able to do in this kind of case is have Bodhi explain, hey, this package is critpath because $THIS_OTHER_PACKAGE depends on it, and if $THIS_OTHER_PACKAGE is working okay, then this package has fulfilled its critpath responsibilities, go ahead and +1 it). -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
