Re: critpath approval process seems rather broken

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 15:01 -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
> The bug I'm looking at right now is specifically against the live
> image, so no I can't test that with something in updates testing. It
> needs to make it to the base before it gets on the live media to see
> if it solves the problem there.

BTW, someone did mention to me that the Beta might need the new mdadm
for the /run change, but there were no critical bugs already filed on
it. I tested it on my laptop, which has an Intel BIOS RAID array;
booting a live image composed with the current mdadm sees the array, and
so does anaconda if you boot a traditional installer image with the
current mdadm. So I wasn't able to find any release-critical issue which
would require the new mdadm.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux