On 03/31/2011 01:34 PM, Tim Flink wrote: > On 03/31/2011 01:17 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: >> This doesn't seem right. Can't compare across releases? > > At the moment, this is expected behavior. Rpmguard only compares builds > within a release or, more specifically, within a koji tag (dist-f16 in > this particular case). > > If you would like to see comparisons across tags, please file an > enhancement request with AutoQA [1]. > > Tim > > [1] https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/ Okay, will do. The (or its parents) made me think it would look in earlier releases. > > PS: > autoqa-devel@ would probably be a good list to at least cc: for rpmguard > (or other autoqa test) questions. > >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: rpmguard: PASSED; 0 warnings for netcdf-4.1.2-1.fc16 >> Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 19:14:27 +0000 (UTC) >> From: autoqa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> To: autoqa-results@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netcdf-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >> Stored logs available at >> <http://autoqa.fedoraproject.org/results/76250-autotest/qa03.c.fedoraproject.org/> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> ======================================== >> netcdf-4.1.2-1.fc16 >> ======================================== >> N: There is no previous build of netcdf-4.1.2-1.fc16 in dist-f16 tag (or its >> parents). >> N: ---- > > -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
