On Mon, 2004-05-10 at 22:27, Jeremy Katz wrote: > On Mon, 2004-05-10 at 21:15 -0600, Stephen Smoogen wrote: > > THe second matter is that the 3.6 GSSAPI is > > not compatible with the 3.8 version due to the differences in the > > proposed RFC between the 2 times. > > Which, incidentally, is why we didn't include the patches when they were > first being proposed :) Nalin was, justifiably, worried about just > this happening. > Well sadly, I know of several large organizations that had to include them anyway (or stop Linux deployment period.) Thankfully there is a patch to enable backwards compatibility so that a transition can be done someday. > Jeremy -- Stephen John Smoogen smoogen@xxxxxxxx Los Alamos National Lab CCN-5 Sched 5/40 PH: 4-0645 Ta-03 SM-1498 MailStop B255 DP 10S Los Alamos, NM 87545 -- You should consider any operational computer to be a security problem --