Re: Shared library permissions in Debian-land and Red Hat-land

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> So, is it true that the convention is 0644 in Debian and 0755 in Red
> Hat-land? If so, does anyone know why the difference, and if this needs
> to stay different forever? Also, I presume neither of us is patching
> several thousand shared library packages for this, so are the
> permissions usually set by libtool or something similar, and that's
> where the configuration is set?

I don't know all that much about the conventions for this under Linux,
but I'm familiar with other Unix-oid platforms where shared libraries
*must* have execute permission or they flat out don't work.  (HPUX is
that way for sure, and I think most BSDen as well.)  So it would not be
surprising for upstreams to prefer to install 0755 everywhere for
portability.  I think Debian is on the wrong side here, if your
informant is correct about their policy in the first place ...

			regards, tom lane
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux